Space engineers nanite factory mining how to#

If air resistance were properly modeled, then yeah, you'd stop somewhere in the middle because of drag sapping your velocity. I've never had an issue with drill breakage - it's usually everything behind the drills that gets crushed. Short of being more gentle, I'm not sure.

Any suggestions? Otherwise, I'll eventually trial-and-error it, I guess.

Space engineers nanite factory mining how to#

Note: I have a bad habit of breaking the drills off of my mining ships and I'm not really sure what causes it or how to avoid it. I volunteer to help with Project Hellmouth! At some point, I suspect that high heat and high pressures make the atmospheric drag act significantly different than how it acts on the surface, but that's unclear without some real math. At that point, I think you'll have a lower acceleration force and still denser atmosphere so you'll continue to slow down due to drag.

If you're Felix Baumgartner and start from the edge of space, you get to reach 372m/s (current record), but will be slowing down as you reach denser atmosphere.ДЄs you get through the earth, atmosphere will continue to get denser and you'll continue to accelerate until you have an appreciable amount of earth behind you. On an Earth-like planet, human terminal velocity is about 54m/s in belly-down position and ~150m/s in a head-down dive. Provided it's not a crazy number then that might just be the long term goal of our next Co-op Nite server. Now I'm going to have to dust off some of my old physics and/or calculus books and see if I can figure out what the maximum speed would be. The speed limit of 105 m/s is changeable in the config files, though, so maybe. While this means that you'd be able to make it to the other side theoretically, the terminal velocity imposed by the game prevents you from doing so. So if the planets have their own gravity, and you can drill through the core, could you jump into the hole and land safely on the other side?ДЇrom what I've heard from the folks who took the 'it's impractical to drill through the planet' as a personal challenge and also have enough RAM to handle what that does to the world size, gravity decreases the closer you get to the core. Not to mention getting all your eggs out of that one basket. Splitting them into two (or I guess 3) active products has a lot of benefits as far as countering lulls in workload and not having to deal with project-contingent staff. That's a lot of people to corral and manage on a single project without some hardcore project management experience. If they're using the same genre, style, and engine - there's a lot here for consumers of both products to benefit from.ДЇrom a different viewpoint, the blog mentions they're now 40-men strong. A medieval setting has different requirements for volumetric environments and it forces us to look at the engineering genre from a different angleДЄnd he then goes into a list of features that Space Engineers gained because they prototyped them first for use in Medieval Engineers.(There are separate teams for Space Engineers, Medieval Engineers and our secret AI project) We started to hire new people so that we would have the resources to develop both games in parallel without sacrificing any of them.We are leveraging our existing technology and experience.We didn't want to keep creating space games only.Development of Medieval Engineers hasn't had a negative impact on the development rate of Space Engineers.He gives a well-supported answer that was a fun read, but here's the bullet points: We were expecting that many people would ask вЂњwhy are they developing a new game when Space Engineers is still in development and not finishedвЂќ? Why Medieval Engineers when Space Engineers is still not finished?